0

Hyundai Ioniq 5 vs Tesla Model Y: Which EV Wins in 2025?

Published Sep 5, 2025, 6:52 AM
Last Updated Apr 16, 2026, 11:20 AM

The 2025 year seems to be huge for electric cars as it introduces many EVs other than Tesla which once dominated this market alone. Now, other competing cars take place leading to Hyundai Ioniq 5 vs Tesla Model Y battle showdown. The two cars are considered to be useful and stylish for buyers. 

Both are widely popular for delivering quite pleasant electric driving experiences. Both are updated with new features but which one is best for you is a complex question. Let’s solve this puzzle together through this detailed blog.

Pricing and Value

The 2025 Hyundai Ioniq 5 will cost you around $43,975 but additional trims and special edition (N or XRT) can cost you around mid-$50,000.

Hyundai IONIQ 5

Image Credit: Hyundai

The 2025 Tesla Model Y including AWD & Long Range variants prices hovers in the $46,000 – $50,000 range. The cost can go up with additional performance trims.

Tesla Model Y in India

Image Credit: YouTube

Ultimately, Hyundai offers more features and a comfortable ride with low starting cost. Meanwhile, Tesla’s full Self-Driving feature cost more that its starting prices. 

Range and Efficiency

While buying a car most buyers check range and efficiency, and here Tesla Model Y is slightly up with its long range up to 330–337 miles. The Ioniq 5 is catching up with an 84 kWh battery to deliver range up to 300–318 miles. So, while Tesla is delivering a bit more range, Hyundai now offers more than enough for daily commutes and long trips.

Charging Technology and Infrastructure

The battle gets interesting here, Ioniq 5 is shining with an 800-volt system that charges at speed from 10% to 80% in just 18 minutes. It becomes possible with super-fast DC chargers that provide top-notch speed, also used in luxury EVs like Porsche & Audi.

But Tesla’s charging network is bigger than any other car, even in 2025. It offers more locations, makes it easy and simple to use. The good news? Hyundai Ioniq 5 now uses the NACS standard means it can use Tesla Superchargers too. 

Image credit: Tesla

These things made it super easy for Hyundai but Tesla still won for offering greater ease.

Performance and Driving Experience

These two crossovers are explosive, but they do things differently. The standard Ioniq 5 AWD version delivers 320 horsepower, the true monster is the Ioniq 5 N model which produces over 600 horsepower and track-ready parts. The XRT trim of Hyundai is more into off-road action ready demon. 

The Tesla Model Y offers outstanding performance in a speed range from 0-60 mph in 3.3 seconds. Performance is equal to a sports car. The quick acceleration of the Tesla is a remarkable feature with its quick tuning. 

Tesla and Hyundai N models both offer unstoppable performance that excite speed lovers. Tesla has offered straightforward speed, while Hyundai more evolved into driving experience.

Read More: Toyota RAV4 vs Honda CR-V: The Ultimate SUV Battle of 2025

Interior and Tech

The difference is obvious inside both vehicles. The Ioniq 5 offers a practical cabin with 12-inch displays for the infotainment system and comfortable seats made with high-quality material for both driver and passengers. Controls are real and easy to use, overall the interior is giving a pleasure and decent experience of the trip. 

Image credit: Hyundai

The Model Y offers amazing features in a minimalist cabin with a single touchscreen infotainment system. Its first approach is software that delivers outstanding controls and provides features like autopilot for full self-driving. Now, it has become tech savvy’s favorite electric vehicle.

Read Also: Mahindra Thar vs Maruti Jimny: Which SUV Dominates Off-Road?

Practicality and Everyday Use

Both cars offer large spaces for long family trips. Tesla offers more back space and optional 3rd row seating available in some markets. Hyundai offers excellent ride, comfort, and roomy back seat, making it easy to use.

Ultimately, both are versatile and are a good electric choice. They work perfectly for daily commutes and road-trips.

Quick Comparison Hyundai Ioniq 5 vs Tesla Model Y

Category Hyundai Ioniq 5  Tesla Model Y 
Starting Price (US) From $43,975 (higher trims mid-$50k; N & XRT editions cost more) From $46,000–$51,000 (Performance and FSD push costs higher)
Range (EPA/est.) 300–318 miles depending on trim & wheels 300–337 miles depending on motor & wheels
Charging 84 kWh Battery, fastest charging (10–80% in 18–20 min) Supercharger network access
Performance AWD standard: 320 hp, Ioniq 5 N: 600 hp (track-focused), XRT for rugged use Long Range AWD quick & efficient; Performance trim does 0–60 mph in 3.3s
Interior & Comfort Two 12-inch screens, premium materials, mix of physical + digital controls Minimalist cabin with single touchscreen; software-driven interface
Tech & Software Infotainment system & now supports Tesla plug (NACS) Industry-leading OTA updates, Autopilot, optional Full Self-Driving package
Charging Network Compatible with Tesla Superchargers + CCS chargers Exclusive Supercharger network with best coverage & reliability
Practicality Comfortable ride, roomy 2-row crossover, stylish design Very spacious, large cargo space, optional 3rd row (in some markets)

Conclusion

The two cars are ready for the battle Hyundai Ioniq 5 vs Tesla Model Y. Hyundai provides driving quality experience with more advanced features at fastest speed and more cargo space for family trips. Tesla is a fully tech optimized vehicle which offers full self-driving options and more add-ons features in trim versions. Both cars offer amazing driving experience, so there is no single winner, but the right choice depends on your lifestyle. 

Sharey Khan

Sharey Khan is an IT entrepreneur and petrol head & a car enthusiast. With a special focus on car-related content, he combines his deep passion for vehicles with a talent for crafting informative, engaging, and easy-to-understand content. His writing is driven by a genuine love for cars and he is committed to providing readers with accurate, up-to-date, and trustworthy information that empowers smarter driving decisions. 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

0

Subaru Forester vs Honda CR-V 2025: Which SUV Is the Real Champion?

Published Jul 31, 2025, 5:52 AM
Last Updated Apr 11, 2026, 11:08 AM

 Subaru Forester vs Honda CR-V 2025 Which SUV Is the Real Champion

When you are going to buy a SUV, you must get confused about which SUV is the real champ — Subaru Forester vs Honda CR-V. Here you can explore their full details of engine, performance, speed, and design of the two most amazing SUVs. Subaru Forester has unveiled its incredible redesign while Honda CR-V continues to ride high on its latest generation. This isn’t just a battle of features and specs but it’s about both car philosophies. 

Both cars are giving utterly experience to their owners, Forester is made for adventurous-ready partners that are always ready for the rough roads and comes with all-wheel drive. On the other hand, Honda CR-V is smooth, fuel-efficient, and comfortable for running around the city with elegance. Let’s look deeper into the comparison of Subaru Forester vs Honda CR-V for making it easier to choose for you.

Performance: A Tale of Two Drivetrains

The biggest difference between these two SUVs lies right under the hood and in the wheels that put the power down.

Subaru Forester: If you are a person who likes to go on adventure trips or rough roads, the Forester is your champion. All new Forester’s provide AWD which is impressive if we look into the best SUV, Subaru’s legendary Symmetrical All-Wheel Drive as standard. It is ready for rain, snow, or on that gravel road to the trailhead. The powerful system is built on the 2.5-liter with 180 horsepower. It provides a four-cylinder to make it unstoppable but it won’t win many drag races, it’s smooth, capable, and gets the job done.

There is big news for Forester lovers — a Forester Hybrid is coming soon which offers the fuel efficiency that means buyers will get a well-performed SUV with no worries for fuel.  

Honda CR-V: Honda CR-V powerful engine of 1.5-litre will give wonderful performance with its quick speed and extensive high brakes. The turbo engine with 190 horsepower, delivers incredible smooth running on road with its elegant look. The highlight is hybrid powertrain — CR-V Hybrid, stronger with 204 horsepower that can give you the thrill and deliver the purpose of fuel saving — we’re talking up to an EPA-estimated 40 MPG combined.

Who Wins? CR-V is good in saving fuel and sticking to city roads but for all-wheel drive, you have to pay extra. While Subaru gives you for free and supports you totally on your off-road adventure.

Performance Verdict: The Forester is the best choice if you want go-anywhere capabilities because it offers. The CR-V is an ideal SUV for those who want an SUV for daily on-road efficiency, especially in its hybrid form which is more powerful.

Read More :- Jeep Wrangler vs Ford Bronco 2025: Full Comparison of Specs, Style & Performance

Interior and Practicality: The Space Race

Both have amazing style but practically different in cargo space, windows, and door. 

Honda CR-V: The wide interior view and well shaped design is delivering a cool experience to the families traveling or friends enjoying in the SUV. The CR-V is delivering not just a car but total flexibility to their passengers with cargo space of 76.5 cubic feet.

Honda CR-V Interior and Practicality

Honda CR-V Interior and Practicality

The space for the rear seat makes everyone comfortably sit and drive for long hours. Honda has already made the name in fancier cars all over the world.

Subaru Forester: The redesigned 2025 Forester offering a cargo space of 74.4 cubic feet with hands-free liftgate for making packing easy. It also offers a wide back opening, no problem with a trip ready mood.

Subaru Forester Interior and Practicality

Subaru Forester Interior and Practicality

You can have a fully functional and modernized interior in one SUV. It has great visibility from the upright windows and thin pillars which is fantastic for navigating tight parking lots or scenic byways. 

Who Wins? Almost a tie because CR-V has a high-end functional and sleek design with more space whereas Forester gives great view and practicality.

Interior Verdict: If you want to feel classic era and a slightly more cargo space then CR-V is might be the best option but If you want good visibility, rugged, and user-friendly design then Forester is a good option. Both are marvelous companions in your driving with a slight difference which will give you incredible experience.

Tech and Infotainment: Screen Time

Subaru Forester: The Forester’s new 11.6-inch vertical touchscreen is best for perfect display of the infotainment. Apple Car Play and Android Auto supported infotainment system helps you connect in quick with any device.

Subaru Forester Tech and Infotainment

Subaru Forester Tech and Infotainment

This new tech used in the Forester made it more unique and modern through this upgraded system. 

Honda CR-V: People who are comfortable with a 7-inch touchscreen, with a larger 9-inch screen available on higher trims, CR-V is delivering your desire.

Honda CR-V Tech and Infotainment

Honda CR-V Tech and Infotainment

The system is simple and intuitive, but you only get wireless Apple Car Play and Android Auto with the larger 9-inch screen. Tech Verdict: The Forester takes a slight upscale in its tech with a modern big screen with high-end infotainment system for 2025. 

Safety: A Clear Winner Emerges

The SUV will have an advanced tech system, high performance engine, and comfortable interior but safety concerns come first for many buyers. I think it’s important for every person because accidents can take your loved ones away and it’s the main point that makes them two apart from each other. 

Honda CR-V: The CR-V offers a safety system like adaptive cruise control, lane-keeping assist, and automatic emergency braking but it didn’t get IIHS safety ranking for this model. When it comes to safety there is no option in looking for an alternate choice. 

Subaru Forester vs Honda CR-V 2025

Subaru Forester vs Honda CR-V

Subaru Forester: The Forester has a clean role in the Safety section, it delivers you the latest version of its EyeSight driver-assist technology, which now scans wider areas and reacts more quickly. The upgraded system is more advanced in the safety rules. A new Emergency Stop Assist feature can even be tested, bringing the car to halt for safety after a while it senses you become unresponsive.

Safety Verdict: It is clear that Foster is winning here because of its powerful safety measures for passengers and it also got IIHS ranking for its upgraded system. 

The Final Verdict: Which Champion Is Yours?

Both have won on each stage with their powerful performance, design and features but there is a slight difference which makes you choose any one. If you want an SUV for long tour rides then the Forester is a winning trophy because it gives full support for the safety of the passenger. The cargo automatic features are easy to handle by anyone. If you value these things then buying the Forester is worth your money.

CR-V will give you reputation and efficiency for more fields, if you are satisfied with Honda cars before then this might be the best option. If you want an SUV then be sure to take a test-drive for both. And choose what will suit your life journey. 

Choose the 2025 Subaru Forester if:

  • You want full AWD in your SUV with all the weather security support.
  • You want a top safety rated SUV because Safety is your number one priority.
  • You value the best interior and outside view is one of the priorities.
  • You travel more and most likely onto dirt roads, snowy paths, or always ready for adventures.

Choose the 2025 Honda CR-V if:

  • You want a fuel efficient SUV which makes you not worry while spinning around the city.
  • You want more cargo area than Forester to adjust more things, with a good interior look.
  • Spinning around on paving roads is your thing.
  • You believe in Honda’s reputation and flexibility of the quality features, and trust on history of delivering satisfaction.

Ultimately the Subaru Forester vs Honda CR-V, the Forester is the champion of SUV when it comes to adventure and safety, meanwhile the CR-V is the champion of efficiency and refinement. Test drive both, list what you can do with your SUV and which one will help you best in your life and you’ll find your perfect champion.

0

The 2025 Toyota Camry: Performance, Features, and Safety

Published Oct 11, 2025, 4:36 AM
Last Updated Oct 11, 2025, 4:38 AM

Toyota Camry 2025

The 2025 Toyota Camry is now on sale and it is shaking up the midsize sedan segment!Toyota is going all hybrid for the ninth-generation model – the traditional gas-only engines are being dropped. With four trims—LE, SE, XLE, and XSE—the Camry is melding efficiency with style and performance now more than ever. Loaded with all the latest technology and safety features and boasting a great design, the only question to answer is if you are an environmentally-friendly driver or just like a great ride. And with competitive starting prices, it’s obvious Toyota still wants the Camry to be a leader in its segment.  

Strategic Shift and Core Performance

What that means for 2025, that means the 10th-generation is available-standard as a hybrid powertrain. The fifth generation Toyota Camry is available only as a hybrid, utilizing the Toyota Hybrid System with a 2.5-liter 4-cylinder engine along with electric motors. This strategic shift dramatically elevates the baseline performance and results in exponential returns in efficiency. 

The default Front-Wheel Drive (FWD) setup has Rated Combined 225 horsepower output. For those who choose the Electronic On Demand All-Wheel Drive (AWD), which is optional, the system adds an additional rear electric motor and output rises to 232 net combined horsepower. Power is transmitted via an Electronically Controlled Continuously Variable Transmission (ECVT).  

The hybrid system requirement makes the 2025 Camry no less powerful and a whole lot more efficient than last stable’s base gasoline trim. With the instant torque of the electric motors, the car feels more lively around town and enables the sedan to deliver respectable 0-60 mph times between 6.8 and 7.7 seconds. 

Driving Dynamics and AWD Trade-Offs

The chassis received revised suspension and brake systems engineered to attain an ideal harmony of ride comfort and handling stability. Tighter body control in cornering is the result of sport-tuned independent front and multi-link rear suspensions on the SE and XSE trims, particularly the latter.

Toyota Camry Driving Dynamics and AWD Trade-Offs

Four different grades are available with the same AWD system engineered primarily for traction on diverse surfaces. It does come with a slight power increase of 7 horsepower over the FWD option, but it undoubtedly needs to be measured against the efficiency. Oil may be customers first choice in order to achieve the best fuel economy for maximum, but AWD models has a rather heavy penalty on mileage due to the extra weight and drag of the electronic AWD system so if your focus is absolute best fuel economy and you don’t want to drive in the snow, FWD is your better bet. 

Fuel Efficiency and Cost Analysis

The 2025 Camry is able to deliver best-in-class efficiency ratings with the standard THS 5 system equipped. The entry-level LE front wheel drive model sets the bar closer to the stars with a combined 51 MPG (53 city/50 highway) figure from the manufacturer. 

The standard THS 5 system allows the 2025 Camry to achieve best-in-class efficiency ratings. The base LE FWD model sets the bar higher with a manufacturer-estimated 51 combined mpg (53 city/50 highway). 

Table for Toyota Camry EPA-Estimated Fuel Economy

Trim  City MPG Highway MPG Combined MPG
LE FWD 53 50 51
LE AWD 51 49 50
SE FWD 48 47 47
SE AWD 46 46 46
XLE FWD 48 47 47
XLE AWD 46 46 46
XSE FWD 48 47 47
XSE AWD 44 43 44

Tech geeks will notice a flattening of fuel economy: the SE, XLE and XSE FWD models all have the same 47 combined MPG figure. That means when you go up the pack and up in wheel size and luxury amenities from the all-out efficiency focused base LE, you’re getting a 47 MPG ceiling on the FWD models. 

Pricing Structure and Standard Features

2025 Camry is pricier than the outgoing gas-only version, but it remains competitively priced, especially in light of the required advanced hybrid powertrain.

Toyota Camry Pricing Structure and Standard Features

The base LE model has a starting MSRP (Manufacturer’s Suggested Retail Price) of $28,400. All prices do not include the Dealer Processing and Handling Fee (DPH) of $1,095. 

Pricing by comfort and technology is clear:

LE: Begins at $28,400, delivering the most efficiency and the most robust standard features.

SE: Starting at $30,700, with sport styling, synthetic leather seating (SofTex), and 18-inch black-finished wheels. 

XLE: Begins at $33,400, opening the doors to luxury with rich materials and larger screens.  

XSE: Starting at $34,600, the top sport model comes with 19-inch smoked gray/black wheels.  

While it’s a bit pricier at the bottom end, the addition of the hybrid system and important standard tech makes it easy for the buyer to justify the expense. The base LE includes dual-zone automatic climate control, wireless smartphone charging, and wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto functionality. 

Interior Technology and Digital Segmentation

The cabin has been completely re-engineered for the ultimate comfort and latest technology. One of the levers in making the value proposition clear across the grades is the size of the digital displays. Its 8-inch Toyota Audio Multimedia screen is standard with LE and SE trims. 

However, the XLE and XSE models receive a significant upgrade: a massive 12.3-inch touchscreen that is flanked on the right by an identical size digital instrument cluster. This dramatic increase in digital real estate is one of the memorable tacit codes used to distinguish the mid/upper-trims. These luxury models also offer optional features including a 10-inch color Head Up Display (HUD) and heated and ventilated front seats. And most importantly, modern connectivity isn’t locked away: Wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard on all models in the lineup.  

Read More 👉  The 2025 Volvo XC90 Review, Safety Ratings and Pricing in Detail — Best Trims for Families

Advanced Safety and Ratings

The commitment to high-level safety is evident in the availability of the all-new Toyota Safety Sense 3.0 (TSS 3.0) package as standard equipment across the entire 2025 Camry lineup. · Technology upgrades TSS 3.0 features upgrades like an upgraded forward-facing camera and radar sensor with wider field of view.   

Key features of TSS 3.0 Pre-Collision System with Pedestrian Detection Dynamic Radar Cruise Control (DDRC) Lane Tracing Assist (LTA) Proactive Driving Assist Spreading further safety You may also like. Plus two critical driver-assist tech — Blind Spot Monitor (BSM) and Rear Cross-Traffic Alert (RCTA) — are standard for every trim, including the base LE version.  

The 2025 Camry is built to be safest in class. The early international crash safety testing and the vehicle’s structural design suggest that it will pass the rigors of the IIHS Top Safety Pick+ award. Testing confirms strong performance including “Good” for the pedestrian auto frontal crash prevention system.  

One contributor to future vehicle durability is TSS 3.0 being Upgradable to Over The Air (OTA) Software Updates. This enables Toyota to roll out vital updates and additional advanced features to the ADAS suite post-purchase, maintaining the relevance and safety of the vehicle long-term, without ever needing the involvement of a dealer. 

Conclusion

The 2025 Toyota Camry deftly pivots from regular midsize sedan to technology-driven, full-hybrid vehicle. This ninth-generation model builds on the proven efficiency of THS 5 to offer a level of performance that is both competitive and class-leading in fuel economy, particularly in the base LE trim. With its range of essential safety and connectivity features (TSS 3.0, BSM, Wireless CarPlay) Toyota takes care of delivering good value for the all grades, while the large digital displays and luxury touches are reserved for the XLE and XSE grades.

0

Best Brake Pads for Cars: Top Options for Safe Driving

Brake Pads

If you are wondering that buying premium brake pads will not get loosened up quickly and save you by kicking on the car that is just next to you, then you are wrong. The best brake pads for cars are actually the ones that fit and are durable on the road. Brands are making specific types of brake pads so they can handle the Indian roads and traffic area when you have to push your foot on the brake pedal every five-minutes.

Most car owners in India replace pads only when a mechanic points at worn friction material or the dashboard warning light comes on. That’s late. Pads typically wear down to replacement thickness around 30,000–35,000 km in Indian city conditions, where stop-and-go traffic and frequent braking put more cycles on the pad than steady highway driving would. Waiting for a screech means you’ve likely already scored the rotor, which turns a ₹2,000 pad job into a ₹6,000–₹8,000 pad-and-disc job.

Let’s look into a breakdown of what makes one brake pad different from others, which offers the quality that you need for your car and where you should buy it.

What Actually Separates One Brake Pad from Another

There are three friction categories which define the quality of brake pad and make one different from another. Understand these categories before buying it because that matters more than the brand name on it.

Semi-metallic pads mix steel wool, copper, or iron with friction material. They handle heat well — Indian summers and hill-descent braking can push disc temperatures past 500–600°C — and they bite harder under sudden braking. The real drawback is its increased noise and quicker rotor wear.

Ceramic pads make no noise and produce less brake dust which make the wheels alloy cleaner and run last longer under normal city driving. They are also expensive because they are made up of clay-and-fiber compounds reinforced with copper or metal fibers. But they’re not good in hot areas as semi-metallic pads so it makes them effective for hatchbacks and sedans running in cities and highways rather than mountain driving or heavy towing. 

Brake Pads

Non-asbestos organic (NAO) pads are the softest and quietest option, common on entry-level OEM fitments. They’re gentle on rotors but wear out faster and lose bite when hot, so they’re a budget-daily-commute choice rather than a performance one.

Fitment matters as much as compound. A pad that’s a perfect metallurgical match for a Honda City won’t necessarily exist in the same part number for a Hyundai Creta, even if both are C-segment cars. Always cross-check the pad against your car’s exact variant and manufacturing year before ordering — a wrong-fit pad can affect ABS calibration on newer cars with electronic brake-force distribution.

Best Brake Pads for Cars in India: Top Picks

1. Bosch QuietCast / Bosch DoubleTec

Compound: Semi-metallic and ceramic variants | Indicative price: ₹2,000–₹4,000 per axle set

Bosch supplies brake components directly to several OEMs in India, which means their aftermarket pads are built to the same tolerances as what left the factory on many Maruti Suzuki and Hyundai models. The QuietCast line uses a rubber-core shim under the backing plate specifically to cut down pad squeal, which is the most common owner complaint with cheaper aftermarket pads. This is the pick for someone who wants a known-quantity daily driver pad without shopping by price alone.

2. TVS Girling

Compound: Semi-metallic, OEM-spec | Indicative price: ₹1,200–₹2,500 per axle set

TVS Girling is an original-equipment supplier for a wide range of Indian passenger cars, so buying their aftermarket pad is close to buying a factory-spec replacement rather than a third-party approximation. It’s not a performance pad — don’t expect Brembo-level bite — but for a hatchback or compact sedan doing standard city driving, it’s the pad most Indian service centers will already stock and recommend.

3. Rane Brake Lining (RBL)

Compound: Semi-metallic and NAO variants | Indicative price: ₹1,000–₹2,200 per axle set

Old car or second hand car owners mostly prefer Rane Brake Lining because they are the most budget-friendly and well-established brand here. RBL brake pads are reliable and durable, serving excellent stopping power without paying for a premium badge. That’s why it becomes one of India’s largest domestic manufacturers of brake friction material.

4. Brembo

Compound: Semi-metallic, performance-oriented | Indicative price: ₹6,000–₹10,000+ per axle set

Brembo is an expensive brand serving premium OEM braking systems for components for luxury SUVs and well-performing cars. Its aftermarket pads are designed for providing consistent stopping power in a high-rise temperature, it is a strong choice for hill drivers and cars taking trips on Manali–Leh or Munnar routes, and for cars that see spirited driving. For flat-city commuting, this is more pad than most drivers need — the price reflects performance headroom, not a proportionally better daily-driving experience.

5. ADR

Compound: Ceramic and semi-metallic | Indicative price: ₹1,500–₹3,000 per axle set

ADR has built a presence in the Indian aftermarket as a mid-tier option — priced above the budget domestic brands but below Bosch and Brembo. It is worth checking for hatchback and compact-SUV applications where ADR’s Ceramic line is marketed as a quieter replacement to semi-metallic OEM pads at the same price. 

6. Workshop-brand ceramic pads (e.g., GoMechanic Safetec+, Ceradrive)

Compound: Ceramic | Indicative price: ₹1,500–₹3,500 per axle set

Among some of the new-age options is the emergence of house-brand ceramic brake pads by some workshop chains and online retailers for popular cars such as the Alto, WagonR and Celerio. They can be quieter, produce less dust and cost less, making them ideal for everyday city driving. However, they don’t have the history of established manufacturers, so definitely look at the warranty coverage and recent reviews for your particular car before opting for one over a name brand. 

Bosch vs. TVS Girling: The Two Most Common Choices

These two come up most often when Indian owners ask a mechanic “which pad should I actually buy,” so a direct comparison is more useful here than a generic spec table.

Bosch QuietCast/DoubleTec TVS Girling
Compound Semi-metallic / ceramic Semi-metallic
Indicative price ₹2,000–₹4,000 ₹1,200–₹2,500
Noise level Low (shim-damped) Moderate
Workshop availability Wide, including multi-brand service chains Very wide, especially at authorized dealer network garages
Best for Daily driving where quiet operation matters Budget-conscious daily driving, factory-spec replacement

If your priority is matching exactly what the manufacturer intended and paying the least for it, TVS Girling is the more defensible choice. If you’ve noticed brake noise with your current pads and want that fixed on the next replacement, Bosch’s shim design specifically targets that problem.

OEM Dealer vs. Aftermarket: What You’re Actually Paying For

At a Maruti Suzuki authorized workshop, front pad replacement typically runs ₹1,800–₹2,500 including fitting. Hyundai dealer pricing tends to sit around ₹2,000–₹3,500. For Honda, Toyota, Renault, and Nissan, OEM pad-and-labor costs commonly start from ₹3,500 and climb depending on the model. These figures move with your city and specific service center, so treat them as a planning range rather than a quote.

Brake Pads

When you buy manufacture approved brake pads at a dealer price for your exact car with warranty linked to your service, you pay an extra ₹500–₹1,500 if the same compound is available in the aftermarket. The catch is as long as you confirm they fit your car and have them installed by a trusted mechanic. 

Both options are not always perfect if you have a warranty for your car then OEM pads may be a safer choice. These aftermarket pads from a trusted brand are good for old and second cars, as it can save money without sacrificing safety. 

Things to Review Before Making a Decision

A couple of things are always worth confirming before you buy, no matter which brand you’re considering: see if the listing is for your exact variant and year of car, not just the model name because brake systems change across facelifts. 

Look for a friction material certification (ECE R90 is the relevant European homologation standard many Indian aftermarket brands now reference) rather than relying on marketing copy alone. And if a listing price looks unusually low for a named brand like Bosch or Brembo, treat it as a counterfeit-risk signal — India’s aftermarket brake market has a known problem with pads sold under premium branding that aren’t genuine, and a pad that’s dimensionally wrong or metallurgically inconsistent is not somewhere to save ₹500.

Brake Pads

None of the brands above is the universally “right” answer — a Brembo pad on a city-only hatchback is over-spec’d the same way a budget NAO pad on a hill-route SUV is under-spec’d. Match the compound to how and where you actually drive, confirm fitment against your specific variant, and the rest of the decision mostly makes itself.

Conclusion

The best brake pads for your car aren’t necessarily the most expensive ones but the ones which fit your car, depending upon driving conditions and braking needs. Bosch, TVS Girling, or Rane Brake Lining are best fit for cars running in the city everyday as they offer a good performance on stopping, long-lasting, and price. Heavy-performance brake pads like Brembo are best matched for cars running on hills, carrying heavy loads, and pushing harder but the cost is little expensive.

Whatever you choose, don’t ignore the quality product over cheap products which your seller recommended, trust yourself. Check closely exact variant and model-year fitment, trust reliable source, and let the competent mechanic install the pads and inspect discs. The best brake pad is an essential part of the brake system because when stopping matters so the reliability is worth far more than saving a few hundred rupees.

0

Renault and Nissan Alliance Guide – History, Benefits & Future Vision

Published Nov 18, 2025, 12:51 PM
Last Updated Nov 18, 2025, 12:56 PM

Renault and Nissan Alliance

The Renault-Nissan Alliance is one of the best examples of cross-cultural collaboration within the automotive industry worldwide. Since 1999, the strategic cooperation of two very different market players has never ceased to shake and reshape the globally automotive industry with shared technologies, economies of scale and coordinated market strategies. Now the Alliance, which has expanded to include Mitsubishi Motors, oversees eight major automotive brands, is one of the largest automotive groups in the world in terms of sales volume. 

From Rescue to Revolutionary Partnership History

The Founding Era (1999-2003)

The Renault-Nissan Alliance was born out of a time of crisis for Nissan. In 1999, the Japanese carmaker was on the verge of collapse and was seeking a strategic partner worldwide. On March 27, 1999 in Tokyo, Louis Schweitzer of Renault and Yoshikazu Hanawa of Nissan concluded the historic Alliance agreement, with Renault purchasing a 36.8% equity stake in Nissan Motor for around $3.5 billion. That deal also involved the sale of a 15.2% share in Nissan Diesel and the divestiture of Nissan’s five financial units.​

Alliance making was systematic and strategically planned. From mid-1998 to March 1999, a nine-month negotiation process, the two companies pinpointed around 20 potential synergy areas and formed 21 joint study teams to conduct feasibility studies. Carlos Ghosn – who was named President and CEO of Nissan in June, 1999 and who played a key role in formulating the turnaround strategy that saved Nissan in the early days of the alliance. 

In 2001, after Nissan’s return to financial health, the partnership reached an equilibrium with a 15% stake of Nissan in Renault and a 43.4% stake of Renault in Nissan. The two companies exchanged shares, creating the basis for a truly collaborative rather than a controlling partnership. 

Early Growth and Scale Achievement (2003-2010)

The benefits of the Alliance swiftly became evident: joint buying, shared logistics and joint part development. By 2010 the Alliance was delivering annual synergies of over €1.5 billion as a result of combined purchasing, shared warehousing, combined transportation, and harmonized customs procedures over the major markets.  

Alliance With Mitsubishi  (2011-2019)

With Mitsubishi Motors weakening and struggling in 2016, Nissan bought a majority stake in the company. The year after, the Alliance revealed its “full member” concept, enabling Mitsubishi to become part of Renault-Nissan-Mitsubishi from 2017. This enabled growth of the Alliance’s global production base. The expanded Alliance was delivering €5.7 billion in annual synergies by 2017, representing a 14% increase over the previous year. 

The Alliance 2022 strategic plan, disclosed in September 2017, was expected to raise annual synergies to an aggressive €10 billion for the end of 2022. The scheme projected combined sales of more than 14 million units with revenues of $240 billion, as the three member companies shift common platform usage to cover a wider product range. 

Organizational Challenges and Transformation of the Leadership (2018-2020)

Alliance cohesion was to be greatly shaken when Carlos Ghosn was arrested in Japan in November 2018 and subsequently ousted from his executive positions at Nissan and Mitsubishi. This geopolitics crisis activated long dormant tensions between the French government’s role as shareholder and Japanese management fears of losing control.  

To help bring stability back to the partnership, Renault vowed in a legally binding commitment not to oppose the Nisan board in shareholders meetings.​

Organizational Challenges and Transformation of the Leadership (2018-2020)

In the face of these difficulties, the Alliance unveiled an all-encompassing, €2 billion, three-year cost-cutting package in May 2020 that would slash the number of vehicle platforms from seven to four and that included a “leader-follower” system where one corporate iliad develops a technology first, and others then adopt it. The mission of this structural rethink reinvented the alliance around profits from scale rather than expansion. 

Alliance 2030: The Electric and Connected Future (2020-Present)

In January 2022, the Alliance launched its most ambitious strategic plan for the future –Alliance 2030 – with a pledge to invest €23 billion in electrification over the next five years and with goals for 35 new EV models by 2030. The green roadmap identified pure-electric and intelligent connected mobility as the two key pillars for future growth. 

How the Alliance Creates Value

1. Unprecedented Economies of Scale

The reason for the Alliance’s superiority is that it combines the buying and manufacturing power of three of the world’s largest car companies. As of 2017 it was the largest car manufacturer in the world based on light vehicle sales, assembling more than 10.6 million vehicles annually. The size of the senior from translates into tangible benefits for:

Bargaining powers: The Alliance has precise bargaining powers: against suppliers, through the Renault-Nissan Purchasing Organization (RNPO), created in 2004, managing supplier negotiations for all the three partners. This line of centralized defense significantly cuts component prices. The Common Module Family (CMF) concept tries to achieve 30 to 40 percent reduction in entry costs per vehicle, and 20 to 30 percent reduction in parts costs through massive scale economies.

Platform and component sharing: Instead of developing separately, Alliance partners create modular architecture that allows global use across different brands and vehicle categories. This saves you engineering dollars and still differentiates brands. The same underbody modules, for example, can also underpin vehicles as varied as compact cars and sport-utility vehicles, even across multiple marques. 

2. Shared Technology Development and Innovation

The Alliance pools R&D investment for capital-intensive projects that individual companies might find difficult to finance alone. Prominent areas of innovation are:

Battery and electric vehicle technologies : The Alliance has pledged to renew 220 GWh of battery production capacity worldwide by 2030. 

Nissan pioneers development of revolutionary all-solid-state battery (ASSB) technology that promises to deliver twice the energy density of current lithium-ion batteries while offering one-third the charging time. The aim is to have full-scale production of the ASSB in the mid-2028, and if the future cost target of $65 per kWh is achieved to contribute to cost competitiveness against internal combustion engines.​

Alliance Creates Value

Image credit: Nissan

Common EV platforms: Presently, the CMF-EV platform that has been engineered as a modular platform for 100 percent electric vehicles underpins the Nissan Ariya crossover and Renault Megane E-Tech Electric (with more than 15 models planned for launch by 2030 on this platform, totalling 1.5 million vehicles per year).

Autonomous and connected systems: The Alliance relies on its 20 years of experience in ADAS (advanced driver-assistance systems) and robotic driving to develop the next generation of safety systems. The Alliance aims in originality and development. The Alliance foresees the use of autonomous systems on 10 million vehicles for 45 models by 2026. The joint approach to innovation is exemplified by Nissan’s award-winning ProPILOT system. 

3. Geographic Market Expansion

Add to that the geography of the two companies and the Alliance combines Renault’s strength in Europe, Latin America and Russia with that of Nissan’s in the Asia-Pacific region and strong presence in North America. Mitsubishi brings more expertise to the table in the Southeast Asian region. This geographic complementarity means that:

Joint development of the market: All the three members the Alliance, namely, are focused strategically on India where vehicle development, manufacturing and sales are coordinated. A restructuring in 2025 enabled Renault to buy out its Chennai joint venture (Renault Nissan Automotive India Private Ltd) and streamline its operations.​

Common dealer networks: The Alliance manages dealer profitability and cost reduction through the shared services center and digital platform, enabling a reduction in the cost of infrastructure duplication. 

4. Financial and Operational Synergies

The Alliance generated €5.7 billion of synergies on an annual basis by 2017, which equated to around $6.6 billion of cost reductions and revenue enhancements. These synergies come from:​

Share logistics services: The Alliance achieves more than €200 million a year in logistics synergies through sharing warehouses, containers, crates, seagoing vessels, customs procedures.

Joint financial services: The Alliance’s far-reaching combined financial and bank activities allow for better credit terms and financing fees.

Cross-manufacture of vehicles: The success in commercial vehicles highlights the advantage of cross-manufacture — the Renault Kangoo/Nissan Kubistar, the Master/Nissan Interstar, and the Trafic/Nissan Primastar all share roughly 80% of parts while still distinct brands. 

Core Innovation: Common Module Family (CMF) Architecture

The Common Module Family is the Alliance’s biggest breakthrough in vehicle development efficiency. To be clear, rather than build full platforms for single vehicles, CMF applies modular design with interchangeable “Big Modules”:

The five core modules:

  • Engine compartment module
  • Cockpit module
  • Front underbody module
  • Rear underbody module
  • Electrical and electronic architecture module 

These modules can be mixed and matched to build cars across segments and brands. As an example, a single underbody can be stretched and stretched again to produce a compact sedan, a mid-size sport-utility vehicle and even a large crossover simply by changing module sizes and configurations. 80% of the Alliance model launches between 2014 and 2016 will be based on shared platform and CMF standardisation.​

The CMF architecture evolved drastically towards the Alliance 2030 vision, with the aim of achieving 80% platform commonization by 2026 for the three member companies, in contrast to 60% currently. 

Present Status & Developments (2024-2025)

Nissan is Ready To Overcome Challenges

Nissan was under increasing pressure financially in 2024 with its net profit for the first half falling 93% and the carmaker announcing it was cutting tens of thousands of jobs. There were several reasons: obsolete products, battered brand image, competition from Chinese carmakers, import tariffs in the US, and costs of shifting rapidly to EVs.​

Re:Nissan Recovery Plan

Futuristic looks, a great new engine series, etc. In May 2025, Nissan’s CEO, Ivan Espinosa, presented the all-encompassing “Re:Nissan” revival strategy with a focus on achieving profitability in fiscal 2026. 

Nissan Recovery Plan

There are numerous activities to take into account including the following:­

Manufacturing restructuring: Streamlining production and slashing global capacity by 20% through cutting production plants from 17 to 10. This restructuring shift capital toward electric vehicles and autonomous technology investments. 

Cost saving: Aiming for €400 billion yen (£3.6 billion) in savings by consolidating its supplier panel to obtain higher volume from fewer suppliers and also by reducing legacy inefficiencies.​

Restructuring: Reducing top management by 20 percent, implementing a single-layer non-officer structure, and establishing a smaller, faster-moving global headquarters.

Product focus: Stopping further advanced and post-2026 development to turn 3,000 employees’ attention to cost-cutting. 

Restructured Alliance Agreement

March 2025 was a major overhaul in the Renault-Nissan alliance. The revised agreement allowed more flexibility in cross-shareholdings by reducing the lock-up obligation from 15% to 10%, thus granting more freedom to both companies in terms of shareholding. 

Renault bought 51% stake of Nissan in Renault nissan automotive India, now with this acquisition Renault got full hold on the joint venture and subsided its presence in India while $200 million to Nissan’s immediate cash. Nissan was freed from its obligation to invest in Ampere (Renault’s EV investment company) while continuing on other agreed product projects. 

Read More:- Renault and Nissan Alliance Guide – History, Benefits & Future Vision

Future Vision: Alliance 2030 Roadmap

The Alliance 2030 strategic plan is the most advanced vision of the partnership’s future, built on three pillars: 

1. Electrification Leadership

The €23 billion investment pledge for the next five years backs the development of 35 new EV models by 2030. Of these, 90% will be developed against five common EV platforms which address the major global markets and covers all vehicle segments.”​

Some major EV platforms include the following:

CMF-EV: The global flagship platform is also the first to be built on with the Nissan Ariya and Renault Megane E-Tech Electric as production models

CMF-BEV: A new small car platform for the replacement of Micra EV in Europe 

Shared platforms: Shared models for all three group companies across the C-, D- and SUV segments

Battery strategy: In addition to the 220 GWh production capacity target, the Alliance has full ownership of battery hardware and software—enabling predictive health monitoring, advanced recycling protocols and second life battery applications. 

2. Connected and Autonomous Mobility

The Alliance aims for 25 million connected vehicles exchanging data through the Alliance Cloud by 2026, versus 3 million today. This connectivity enables:​ 

Software updates: Enable all customers such as you & retailers and workshop to enjoy and get more – fend off older game features with new additional features more and services, safety improvements, and personalisation of vehicles and services.

Active driver assistance system: 10 million vehicles with autonomous driving functions across 45 models in 2026 

Google ecosystem integration: The Alliance will be the first mass-market automaker to bring the Google ecosystem to vehicles with native Google Maps, Google Assistant and Google Play integration. 

3. Sustainable and Profitable Growth

Sustainable Vision 2030 is consistent to become a full supporter of a sustainable future with other goals for the environment. The Alliance targets to reach full carbon neutrality in Europe by 2040, to play its part in wider climate goals and stay competitively profitable. 

Conclusion

The Renault-Nissan-Mitsubishi Alliance is a unique strategic automotive collaboration, which has allowed three very different companies to achieve substantial benefits and efficiencies. A relentless focus on EVs, battery technology, software-defined vehicles and autonomous driving systems positions the Alliance to lead the transformation of the automotive industry into sustainable, connected mobility.

The Alliance 2030 roadmap with its target of 35 new EV models, 220 GWh battery capacity and 25 million connected vehicles reaffirms that the tripartite cooperation, though facing short term challenges, is still strategically committed to industry leadership in an era of unprecedented automotive change. 

2

5 Best Affordable SUVs Under 15 Lakhs In India

Published Oct 23, 2026, 12:23 PM
Last Updated Oct 23, 2026, 12:24 PM

SUVs under 15 lakhs

Finding an SUV which can offer an engine, great power to run longer than your expectation is no longer harder. These five best SUVs under 15 lakhs budget offer powerful performance on Indian roads that eventually become the most selective cars. The 2026 listing put the Tata Nexon at number 1 because of its new features and body styling along with reliability.

The list is based on the price announced on the official websites of cars so check the actual price including insurance, registration and taxes from your dealer when you buy. The newly launched Mahindra XUV 3XO, the freshly updated Maruti Brezza, the Hyundai Creta and the Kia Seltos are continuously ranking on the “Best Car 2026” list.

Each one wins a different kind of buyer, and one of them comes with a catch you should know before you walk in.

How These SUVs Under 15 Lakhs Were Picked

The list is filtered according to three most relevant choices that a buyer can have.

  1. Three features which most people want in a car is an automatic or a turbo engine, a sunroof, six airbags which had to be available at or near ₹15 lakh ex-showroom price mark. 
  2. Car reliability also matters when the budget is good. So crash-safety credentials had to be on record.
  3. Most people are looking for post-purchase support like service network, resale and real-world fuel cost which decides how they have to spend after buying an SUV.

Every price mentioned in the table is an ex-showroom price taken from listings updated between July and August 2026. The car’s actual price may differ from these prices because carmakers have revised prices several times this year. Treat them as a guide, then confirm the exact variant price with a dealer in your city.

Five Best SUVs Under 15 Lakhs at a Glance

SUV Ex-showroom range (mid-2026) Engine options Claimed mileage Safety
Tata Nexon ₹7.40 to ₹14.40 lakh 1.2L turbo petrol, 1.5L diesel (115 hp), CNG 17.01 kmpl to 24 km/kg Long-standing Global NCAP 5-star adult rating
Mahindra XUV 3XO ₹7.79 to ₹15.04 lakh 1.2L petrol, 1.2L turbo petrol, 1.5L diesel 17.96 to 21.2 kmpl 5-star Bharat NCAP
Maruti Brezza (2026) ₹7.40 to roughly ₹13.6 lakh 1.0L turbo petrol, 1.5L petrol (103 hp), CNG Up to 25.51 km/kg (CNG) 5-star Bharat NCAP
Hyundai Creta ₹10.91 to ₹20.11 lakh (only lower trims fit the budget) 1.5L petrol, 1.5L diesel Roughly 17 to 22 kmpl 3-star Global NCAP per one listing
Kia Seltos Starts around ₹11 lakh (only entry trims fit the budget) 1.5L petrol, 1.5L diesel, turbo petrol Varies by variant Check current rating

1. Tata Nexon: The Safe, Sensible All-Rounder

The Nexon keeps turning up in sales charts for a reason. It is recognized as India’s second highest-selling car in June 2026, and in May Tata launched a Pure+ PS variant at ₹9.59 lakh that it positions as the cheapest car in the country with a panoramic sunroof. That single move shows how Tata is thinking: put the showy feature on a mid trim, not the expensive one.

Tata Nexon offers choices between engines, a buyer can pick 1.2 L petrol, 1.5 L diesel with manual/AMT gearbox, and CNG version. This is the only SUV whose every trim sits under ₹15 lakh ex-showroom, its top diesel variant is around ₹14.40 lakh which offers 115 hp of power. The claimed mileage falls between 17.01 kmpl to 24 km/kg and Global NCAP is also given a 5-star rating on its crash safety. 

The honest limitation is refinement. The three-cylinder turbo-petrol is the usual complaint in reviews, with more idle thrum than the Brezza’s engines. Pick the diesel or the CNG if you drive long distances and can live with that trade making it for families who want safety, space and a huge service network in one package.

Tata Nexon CNG

2. Mahindra XUV 3XO: The Feature-Loaded Performer

The new Mahindra XUV 3XO price starts at Rs 9.99 lakhs (ex-showroom) and it goes up to ₹15.04 lakh. Every trim can fit your budget criteria with a 5-star rating. Buyer can get a wider option on XUV 3XO, from 1.2 L petrol to 1.5 L diesel. The CNG version uses twin CNG cylinders on the same petrol engine. It claimed 24.7 km/kg of mileage. It runs from zero to 60 km in 4.9 seconds in CNG mode.

Most people choose this car because all the variants range between ₹9.99 lakh — ₹12.27 lakh and It competes with the Tata Nexon CNG and Maruti Suzuki Brezza CNG.

XUV 3XO vs Tata Nexon: The Head-to-Head Comparison

The turbo-petrol 3XO feels quicker and its feature list is longer at the same money. The Nexon answers with a CNG option, better efficiency spread and more cabin space. Nexon is the better bet for exactly those two reasons. A 3XO CNG comes with a price near ₹10 lakh, and launched on October 15, 2026. Mahindra offers more thrilling performance and cutting-edge technology in a new styling body.

Best for: buyers who want performance and features first and can accept a firmer ride.

3. Maruti Brezza (2026): The New Turbo Value Play

The 2026 Maruti Suzuki Brezza facelift enters showrooms in July with a starting price of ₹7.40 lakh (ex-showroom). Its 1.0-litre petrol engine offers 110 PS of power. The highest variant ZXI Plus is offered with a Petrol AT powertrain at ₹13.55 lakh so this car fits in the SUVs under 15 lakhs list. 

But one thing every buyer should understand: some ZXI and ZXI Plus versions also have dual-tone options priced ₹15,000 higher. Brezza stands out as the best choice for most people after introducing a facelift with six airbags, ESC, and a 5-star Bharat NCAP safety rating.  

There is a CNG advantage since it claims 26.90 km/kg of fuel efficiency. The real world mileage might be different. It offers 1.5 L S-CNG powertrain with 88 PS and 121.5 Nm at 6 MT transmission while its petrol variant offers both manual and automatic options. LXI trim alone comes in a range of ₹7.40 lakh —- ₹8.30 lakh. 

The limitation is power. The 1.5-litre naturally aspirated petrol is the least exciting engine on this list. Ask the dealer about price and claimed mileage before making up your mind to buy one.

Best for: high-running buyers who want low fuel bills and Maruti’s service reach.

Maruti Brezza

4. Hyundai Creta: The Badge That Costs More Than It Looks

Hyundai Creta comes at a range of ₹10.91 lakh — ₹20.11 lakh ex-showroom so a buyer with a ₹15 lakh budget can get a middle or lower trim. The higher trims with more features and comfort driving is above this price mark. The S diesel price at about ₹15 lakh and the SX petrol above it so check your variant and ask the price from your dealer.

Creta have given you other reliabilities such as resale value and service reach, both are excellent. The diesel variant claimed 21.8 kmpl of mileage which is considered as best in this segment. It’s a direct rival for Seltos, Tata Sierra, Renault Duster and Skoda Kushaq. 

Best for: buyers who prioritise resale and brand comfort over the latest tech.

5. Kia Seltos: The Bigger Car You Will Have to Stretch For

The new Seltos is built on a larger platform and it shows in the cabin. It starts around ₹11 lakh, about ₹9,000 above the Creta, and gets Kia Connect 2.0 with over-the-air updates, something Hyundai’s Bluelink still lacks on the Creta.

The HTK (O) variant is above 15k price mark and most of the higher trims in both petrol and diesel are goes higher range of price up to ₹17.99 lakh —  ₹19.79 lakh which means if you get revised design, upgraded cabin technology and advanced safety standard then it’s worth more than your budget.

But in the entry level variant, you still can get a 1.5 L engine which produces 115 – 160 PS of power depending on the powertrain option. Both petrol and diesel variants offer 6 speed manual transmission. There is no factory-fitted CNG option in the current Seltos line-up.  

Best for: buyers who can push past ₹15 lakh and want the most spacious, tech-heavy option.

Creta vs Seltos: Which to Choose

At the ₹15 lakh price, both Creta and Seltos win but on different criteria. Creta give your resale value and good efficiency figure while Seltos can give you connected features, bigger body, and amazing design. 

Always understand that choosing a car on price mark isn’t the best way for selecting a car because you can expect a higher amount to pay when you ask a quote from a dealer for the variant you choose online.

Conclusion

Choosing a car depends on how you drive and why you need a car. If you run more than 1,500 km a month then Brezza CNG and Nexon CNG is the best option because the fuel efficiency lets you recover at the pump. Nexon also offers peace of mind with safety standards if you travel with your family.

XUV 3XO is new and latest at an affordable price. The CNG variant sits in the list of SUVs under 15 Lakhs. Choose the Creta only if resale and the Hyundai network outrank everything else. If you can stretch your price mark a little more then the Seltos is also a good option for you.

Ask each dealer for the current discount and the waiting period on your variant. Offers on these models have ranged from ₹30,000 to ₹55,000 earlier this year, and that difference can decide a close call.